5. Methods and Counting Crime

Summary and Review

Dr. Wendelin Hume and Ashly Hanna, B.A.

✅ Summary

  • There are nine steps in the research process: planning, conceptualization, choice of method, operationalization, sampling, data collection, data processing, analysis and lastly, application.
  • Quantitative research is theory driven and focuses on aggregates and statistical analysis, while qualitative research is theory generating and seeks to uncover subjective experiences, with themes emerging from the data.
  • The inductive approach begins with collecting data, forming themes that are grounded in these early observations, and concludes with theory, while the deductive approach to research begins with a theory, seeks to test hypotheses, and then moves to the collection of data.
  • Two-Eyed Seeing is the blending of Indigenous worldviews and Western science.
  • A Western approach to research adheres to the scientific method grounded in a belief in individualism, autonomy, purposefulness and meaning, while an Indigenous approach to research values interconnectedness and insists that knowledge be seen within a cultural framework.
  • Ways to measure crime in Canada include the Uniform Crime Report 2 and the General Social Survey.
  • Evidence-based practice uses information to make decisions that is based on research, not opinion, while evidence-informed practice combines information and research with experiences and expertise to best fit the population and culture being served.

🖊️ Key Terms

academic imperialism: an unequal relation between academics where one group dominates while other groups are ignored or silenced.

analysis: the process of compiling and reviewing information, and then summarising and synthesising the data, often with the aide of statistical techniques, to reach a conclusion or explanation about the phenomenon under study.

conceptualisation: to form a concept or idea about something and to become very specific about what we mean by those concepts for the purpose of our own research.

cross-sectional: a research study that gathers data at one point in time. It provides a snapshot of the phenomenon of interest.

data sovereignty: implies rightful ownership of specific data. This involves allowing Indigenous peoples to control who collects data about their people and what data are collected, as well as how the results are disseminated.

deductive: a research model that involves working from the general to the specific, or from theory to data collection. The deductive model employs quantitative methods of research.

empiricism: a method of study based on tangible and observable facts, evidence, and research.

epistemology: the study of knowledge or ways of knowing.

evidence-based: when the information you use to make decisions is based on research, not opinion.

evidence-informed: when information and research is combined with experiences and expertise to best fit the population and culture being served.

experiments: a quantitative scientific procedure performed to determine something or test a hypothesis.

field research: a qualitative method that involves observing and possibly interacting with research subjects in their natural environment.

focus groups: a qualitative method that involves a group of individuals brought together and led by a moderator to share similarities, opinions, or differences.

gatekeepers: a person or position that controls access to something and has the power to decide who obtains resources or opportunities and who does not.

generalisability: the degree to which the results of a study can be applied to a larger population. The larger the sample, the greater the ability to generalise the findings of the study.

grey literature: information produced outside of traditional publishing and distribution channels, including government and community reports, conference papers, and dissertations.

historical trauma: multigenerational trauma experienced by a specific cultural or racial group, such as the violent colonisation experienced by Indigenous peoples.

hypothesis: a proposed explanation used as a starting point in the deductive model for further investigation, or emerging at the end of the research process in the inductive model. A hypothesis is typically written as an “if, then” statement and outlines how we expect the variables to be related to one another and the direction of that relationship.

inductive: a research model that involves working from the specific to the general or from observations to the development of theory. The inductive model employs qualitative methods.

interviews: a qualitative method that involves asking a series of mostly open-ended questions in an effort to capture the participants’ voices in their own words.

literature review: a written summary and overview of writings and other sources on a selected topic to gain an understanding of existing research relevant to the topic.

longitudinal research: a study which extends beyond a single point in time and involves the collection of data at various time intervals.

methodology: system of methods, procedures and principles used in a particular area of study or discipline.

objectivity: ideas that are based on fact and free from bias or personal opinion.

OCAP: the First Nations principles of ownership, control, access, and possession (OCAP) assert that First Nations have control over data collection processes, and that they own and control how this information can be used.

official dataset: data sets often produced by official governmental agencies for administrative purposes, such as Census data or crime figures.

operationalisation: turning abstract concepts or phenomena that may not be directly observable into measurable observations. For example, this would involve selecting the exact wording of survey questions.

population: all members of a particular area or group, or all things, that you want to learn more about from which a sample is drawn.

qualitative: research that involves the collection and analysis of in-depth textual or verbal, non-numerical data. Methods include interviews, focus groups, and field observation.

quantitative: research that involves the collection and analysis of numerical data. It can involve testing causal relationships and making predictions. Methods include closed-ended surveys and experiments.

raw data: data collected directly from the source and that exist at this point without any processing, transformation, or analysis. Interview notes or survey responses are examples of raw data.

reliability: the degree to which a measurement or research method produces consistent results. This consistency can also be understood as replicability, either at different times, and/or by different researchers.

research method: the specific way you will collect data for your research study, such as conducting focus groups, interviews, surveys, or experiments.

sample: a subset of people or things from the larger population we want to know more about. In quantitative research, our samples are larger than in qualitative research.

sampling: the process of selecting which people or things to research (i.e. selecting our sample) from the larger population, with the typical goal of generalising our findings from the sample to the population. In quantitative research, our sampling techniques are random, while in qualitative research, we use non-random sampling techniques to select those people or things with specific characteristics of interest.

scientific colonialism: the state in which the transformation of knowledge production is controlled by the colonisers while other ways of knowing, namely Indigenous ways of knowing, are dismissed.

secondary data: data that the researcher has not collected or created themselves as they already exist. The data in the UCR2 or the General Social Survey are examples of secondary data.

subjectivity: perceptions based on one’s own feelings, experiences, and opinions rather than on external, observable facts.

survey: a quantitative method of collecting data by asking respondents questions in a questionnaire.

talking circle: a type of discussion with participants sitting in a circle, originated by Indigenous peoples and often used as a part of a healing ceremony. Talking circles can also be used to value participants’ sharing of personal experiences for the sake of research.

theory: an explanation for observed facts and laws that relate to a particular phenomenon. It is made up of a set of concepts and an explanation of how these concepts are related to one another.

Two-Eyed Seeing: the blending of Indigenous worldviews and Western science.

unit of analysis: the thing or person being studied and analysed in a research study, such as individuals, groups, organisations or social artifacts.

validity: the accuracy of our research methods, and whether they measure what they intend to measure.

variable: a person, place, thing or phenomenon that you are trying to measure and that varies in value. Age, income, and number of crimes committed are all examples of variables.

Western research design: a typically European or colonial approach with adherence to the scientific method grounded in a belief in individualism, autonomy, purposefulness and meaning.

🧠 Chapter Review

Crossword

Fill in the term in the right-hand column and it will display in the crossword puzzle. Be sure to include spaces where appropriate.

Discussion Questions

  1. Pick a contemporary social issue of interest to you. Outline the type of research study you think could be used to accurately and respectfully investigate this issue.
  2. Find two research studies reported on in your local media. Describe the studies briefly. Determine if the study design was cross-sectional or longitudinal and decide if the design has an important influence on the findings. If the design were different, would the findings possibly have been different?
  3. Write a brief narrative about your first college course or something your classmates agree on. Then, compare narratives with your friends and see if you can identify common themes.
  4. Locate a research finding either in one of your texts or online that concludes there is a deficit or weakness among Indigenous peoples (such as high rates of poverty, low educational attainment, or low interaction with technology). How could this finding be reframed to present Indigenous peoples in a stronger or more resilient way?

License

Icon for the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License

Introduction to Criminology - 2nd Edition Copyright © 2026 by Dr. Shereen Hassan and Dan Lett, M.A. is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, except where otherwise noted.